Philosophy of Judeo Christian Writings Essay

Explain how the Bible portrays the yeastyness of divinity. (25 marks)When read in sequence there atomic number 18 many contradictory statements between Genesis chapter 1 and two. The origins of the globe and nightclub of insertion argon for physical exertion variant. Although in spite of appearance the same holy school school text, the two chapters ply contrasting theories on presentation.Many Christian beliefs ar based around the predilection of creatio ex nihilo, understructure from nothing. Yet the genuinely(prenominal) first lines of their ancient text contradict this. They imply that in fact god was hovering over the waters before beginning the substructure of the earth. If water was already in existence then god did not ready from nothing. more or little Christians look at this statement to be a metaphor to assistance us interpret. The waters represent the unknown and unseen, the imagination of complete nothingness is too difficult to understand s o waters are introduced. Some point to the phrase the earth was formless to give tongue to that perhaps creatio ex nihilo is correct. divinity doesnt create the land still moulds it into a more recognisable form he changes from being a former to being a designer. Many ask this makes the surmisal of god less impressive, for if matinee idol is not the l matchless(prenominal) eternal thing he is no long-lasting unique. The earth is not graven images cerebration tho more his interpretation. A potter whoremonger only make so a good deal with trunk as paragon could only create so much from the chaos of the earth. This limitation means the world is not a creation of perfections exactly the best he could do with what he had.In Genesis 1 the order of creation is light, land, vegetation, day and night, creatures of the sea, birds, livestock, wild animals and fin onlyy humans. Although humans were make in Gods ambit they are the final addition to Gods world. The show of t his produces confusion for God says, in our image, this suggests that there is a group of Gods kinda than one ruling over whole. This is often seen as Gods recognition of human presence meet inevitable, so when he says, our he refers to him/herself and humanity. In chapter 2 of Genesis the order of creation is much different. kind of than humans creation being the cherry on the top they are the very first creation from which all else is based. Also the verse says the Lord God made the earth which suggests creation ex nihilo rather than order from chaos. Equally different from the first chapter, God only creates man originally and women come much later. These contradictions are often the basis of many of the criticisms levelled at Genesis.The difference between God the creator and God the builder is very important and is the basis of all Christian belief. Although there is confusion inside the text it is interpreted as being a theory of creatio ex nihilo, separating God from all else in existence.Gods omniscience, omnipresence and omnipotence are central to his favourable position over humans. Yet if God is truly wise then why did he plant the corner of knowledge in the tend of Eden from which even was tempted to eat the forbidden payoff. If God is omniscient he would have known Eve would eat the fruit and thence deliberately tempted her, if this is correct then it brings in the morality of God. If God knew all this then he deliberately throwd Eve pain which would be an criminal act, and thus God is not pure goodness, but flawed like the human race.Secondly if God is omnipresence how passel he take a physical presence and walk through the Garden of Eden and have a casing to face conversation with Adam. As soon as God takes a physical form like when he breathes into Adams nostrils in chapter 2 he is less divine and less unique. God is idolise because he isnt human, because he is disperse and omnipotent, a cast that is beyond human understanding. If he isnt omniscient or omnipresent does this make him less divine?Differences within the genesis story prove these questions and are the basis of doubt for many non believers.The creative God of the Bible is similar to Aristotles select mover Discuss.(10 marks)A creative God and Aristotles Prime mover are similar in a variety of ways. Both are separate and more powerful than anything of worldly origins. They are two eternal and thus timeless. The very basic idea of a higher power is followed in twain these examples. Yet there are huge differences between the two theories. The creative God of Judeo Christian beliefs is very much an active neighborhoodicipant of the world, he can talk to the people and act upon the requests of humanity. He has the susceptibility to participate in life and have a direct effect on life.This is very different to the Prime mover idea Aristotle believed that there is a higher being that is in its entirety peaceful to life. The prime mover is the original efficient cause that began all the activity within the universe but from that action, has taken no further action. Aristotle believed that in order for his prime mover idea to work, the higher force must be infallible in all ways.He must have no dominance for potential involves change which the PM can neer do. The only effect that the PM has on the world is to attract the people of it, to him. They are attracted to his perfection, he takes no action, neer intervenes and has no plan for it, and this is why he is perfect. He has no flaws because on a very basic level he never makes a decision that can be wrong. morally he also is passive and so therefore can never be evil. Many argue that this inability or refusal to act make the PM an imperfect idea, for he is not perfect but truly neutral.Within the Judeo Christian religions the problem of corruptive and suffering is often a reason not to believe or question the beliefs of others. This isnt an cope within the PM theor y for, the PM never intervenes and therefore all evil is human made, stock-still equally so is all goodness within the world. Within the Judeo Christian religions it is equally the ability of God to do good that attracts people to believe as it is the recognition that evil and suffering is a part of life. God has an active role to play within humanities existence whereas the PM is simply an unaffected ideal that all people are attracted to.